The False Narrative

It is a proven psychological fact that the more often one repeats a thing, the more its subjective truth content rises. Or as the saying goes: "If you repeat a lie a hundred times, it becomes the truth!" Thus it comes about that many Muslims often adopt the narratives and convictions of the unbelievers without criticism. Especially in Germany there are people, mostly wearing suit and tie, who think they could promote interreligious dialogue and achieve acceptance among people in Germany if they follow the official narrative. But Allah tells us that we must verify reports and not simply adopt them just because they are repeated hundreds of times in the media:

In no way are the deeds of Hamas comparable to those of the Israeli occupiers! The Palestinians have been living under the worst conditions in a ghetto for decades. They also have the right, according to UN guidelines, to defend themselves against the fascist apartheid regime by all means! According to the Times of Israel, 418 soldiers and 59 police officers were killed in the Hamas attack. An investigation by the Israeli police also confirmed that the Israeli air force bombed the crowd of civilians who had fled the Supernova rave party. Others were shelled (and also burned) in their homes by tanks. A considerable portion of the dead on October 7 were therefore not victims of Hamas, but of the Israeli strategy. In addition, there were numerous armed settlers in the kibbutzim who cannot be counted as civilians. If one adds all this together, not many civilians killed by Hamas remain. And that these stories of beheaded babies and raped women were propaganda has also been proven by now.

This is therefore clearly a military operation against an occupying power and not a terrorist attack. A terrorist attack would have looked different. By highlighting this fact, one does not excuse un-Islamic deeds or become a Hamas sympathizer; one simply makes clear that a war against "monsters, barbarians, and animals" with thousands upon thousands of dead has no justification and must not be supported by Germany if it does not want to become an accomplice to a genocide and an ethnic cleansing.

That the West, with its long history of colonialism, its world wars, and the millions of civilian dead it has on its conscience after the Second World War alone, has grotesque double standards is not surprising. What is surprising, however, is when Muslims follow the narrative and accuse other Muslims of terror without examining the circumstances!

Unfortunately, Muslims do not question many things, such as the political and financial system in which we live, the globalized school system and its curriculum, etc. It goes so far that hadiths of the Prophet (s.a.w.) are virtually falsified in order to make them conform with the official Western doctrine and so-called scientific facts. One example:

If one searches the internet for the hadith "there is no contagion," one will almost always find the following version: "There is no contagion (except with the permission of Allah)…" The Prophet (s.a.w.) clearly says there is no contagion. But since this conflicts with so-called scientific findings and seemingly also with other hadiths, "except with the permission of Allah" is simply added in parentheses! In many versions the parentheses are not even there anymore! And this despite the Prophet's (s.a.w.) explicit warning that whoever attributes to him something he did not say, let him take his seat in the fire of Hell.

One version of the hadith reads:

Other statements of the Prophet (s.a.w.) that appear to contradict the above are, for example, that one should not put a sick animal together with healthy ones; that one should flee from a leper as from a lion; or that one should not travel into an area where a plague is raging or leave such an area. These hadiths can be well explained with today's "findings." But what about the above?

Various scholars and websites attempt to provide answers, for example at hadithwissenschaften.de, which writes:

Yes, Allah indeed knows best! Good that they still add this!

So, they claim that the statement of the Prophet (s.a.w.) is highly questionable! And they further claim that it is scientifically proven that the coronavirus is contagious, thus following the Western narrative, which makes the statement of the Prophet (s.a.w.) appear questionable! They simply reverse the meaning of what was said. The Prophet (s.a.w.) says there is no contagion — they say, yes there is, if Allah wills it so! And they even think that when governments make vaccination mandatory, one should be obedient and let oneself be turned into a GMO! Even though the Qur'an explicitly says that it is Satan who leads people to alter God's creation, which is clearly the case with the mRNA filth!

One can recognize from the hadiths themselves that this reverse conclusion is inadmissible. For the bedouin in the above hadith began to debate and raised an objection, namely that the other camels would become sick if a sick one were among them. He had therefore not understood it as though there were contagion with Allah's permission. And the Prophet (s.a.w.) did not reply to this: "Of course, you are right, there is contagion, but only with Allah's permission," but instead he asked back: "Who made the first camel sick?"

Furthermore, in the above hadith (and also in other similar ones), contagion is mentioned in the same breath as superstitious things that concretely do not exist, such as a snake in the belly or vermin that calls for revenge, or bird flight or an owl as an omen. If we say here that there is contagion, but only if Allah wills it — then we would also have to say that there is a snake in the belly and vermin calling for revenge if Allah wills it. The above hadith therefore makes clear that contagion, just like the other things, is superstition!

"Oh no, that cannot be! It is scientifically proven!" Really? Many doctors and professors, at any rate, no longer believe in this germ theory, since there is in reality no compelling proof for this theory. For the concept of virus isolation, on which the germ scientists build virus replication, is flawed, since what they call "isolation" is in reality not an isolation at all. They are not able to produce a finite specific form of the coronavirus from the debris of patient sputum or patient samples. They admittedly mix the samples with diseased kidney cells of African monkeys as well as fetal cells, bovine serum, formaldehyde, antibiotics, and other chemicals and poisons. Then they arbitrarily fixate on scraps of debris containing non-miscible genetic substances — RNA fragments enclosed in cell membrane pieces that were ejected from the cells — and call these "viruses," which they then genetically sequence with amplification methods such as the flawed PCR. In no way can they scientifically claim to have extracted a specific virus from a patient's sputum after subjecting it to this mixing and stirring miasma-generation process.

Where did the theory of the virus or of diseases transmitted by germs actually come from?

They come from Louis Pasteur (1822–1895), a contemporary of Antoine Béchamp (1816–1908). They were compatriots and members of the French Academy of Sciences, but their differing views on biology and disease pathology led to a long-lasting rivalry within and outside the Academy. Béchamp was the more brilliant thinker, but Pasteur had political connections, among others to Emperor Napoleon III. Pasteur achieved fame and wealth primarily because his views were in harmony with the politics of his time. History has made the reductionist Pasteur famous as the "father of immunology," who spread the theory that diseases are "a simple interaction between specific microorganisms and a host." In his one-sided concentration on the germ side of the equation, Pasteur ignored the host and disregarded the influence of environmental factors, thereby conveniently obscuring the social responsibility for diseases.

The public and most scientific colleagues found the germ theory easily acceptable at the time and afterwards, and considered Pasteur's model not only superficially plausible but above all financially exploitable. Indeed, most of the large pharmaceutical companies we know today had their beginnings in the Pasteur era, often through mergers with chemical companies that pursued the common goal of developing and selling synthetic products to selectively kill parasites, bacteria, and other invasive, disease-causing microbes. This is a multi-billion-dollar market that not only guarantees huge profit margins but, with increasing technology, also makes it possible to enslave people more and more.

What did Béchamp's competing theory look like?

Béchamp's various discoveries led him to the conclusion that our body is in fact a "mini-ecosystem." When a person's internal ecosystem is weakened — whether by poor nutrition, toxicity, or other factors such as the psyche — the function of the microbes naturally present in the body changes, and disease occurs. Microbes inhabit nearly every part of the human body; they live on the skin, in the gut, and in the nose. They perform vital functions that are important for human survival. The human body contains more microorganisms than human cells — that is, more than about a trillion. Due to their small size, however, microorganisms make up only about 1 to 3 percent of body mass. These microorganisms only become pathogenic when environmental factors worsen the host's cellular "terrain." According to this theory, germs are endogenous and arise within us — and are not lone microorganisms that exist "outside" and wait to opportunistically invade our well-being as virologists and pharmaceutical giants would like. Instead, health and disease are determined by our own actions, thoughts, and attitudes, as well as by our nutrition, lack of exercise, rest and recovery, etc., and by the toxic burdens to which we are exposed, such as chemicals, radiation/EMF, environment, etc., which each produce specific biological effects. (In connection with COVID, 5G radiation must be mentioned here.)

This theory received no financial support and was unpopular. Why? Because no big money can be made with this theory — quite the opposite! It would oblige governments to create healthy environments, both in terms of housing and in the workplace and in social terms. People could not be exploited by, for example, toiling in dirty factory halls, eating junk, living in a broken social environment, and then paying for the medicine they supposedly need to treat the diseases resulting from this "modern" lifestyle. People would also have to take personal responsibility, and instead of becoming consumers of pills, pay attention to their nutrition and lifestyle.

That the environment is very important is conveyed by Islam in many places, both in the Qur'an and in hadith. We should be with the truthful, choose our friends well, not live among idolaters, cleanliness is a part of faith, etc. The Prophet (s.a.w.) also told us that every person is born in the state of fitrah (the original spiritual purity), and only upbringing, that is, the environment, determines whether a person ultimately becomes a Christian, a Jew, or a fire worshipper.

In the same way, according to Béchamp's theory, it is also with microorganisms! They are inherently good, but through the wrong environment they change and become toxic. And it is the same with cells: when they no longer submit to the blueprint of the whole — one could say, the right narrative — they become tumour cells. The principle is therefore the same on every level! When the information of an environment is corrupted, both the microbes and the people change in a negative way. This shows that this world is ultimately spiritual and not material. It is not matter that brought forth spirit, but spirit matter, which is why the Prophet (s.a.w.) said: "Allah has created every soul and determined its lifespan, its death, its sufferings, and its provision."

But of course antibiotics do act against the altered microbes and therefore have an effect, which contributes to the deception that the germ theory is correct. But as we all know, no chemical medicine is free of side effects. This is because the good microbes and the entire milieu are negatively affected. Western medicine is generally only symptom treatment with considerable side effects. However, in certain cases, mostly emergencies, when no alternative medicine is known or available to one, it may also be good to take antibiotics or a headache pill.

Likewise, in certain cases — emergencies — it may sometimes be necessary to kill people. But the goal of jihad is not to eliminate as many "villains" as possible — quite the opposite! It is about establishing the right narrative, that is, making the word of Allah the standard of all life, whereby a healthy environment is created and most diseases disappear of themselves — whether of a physical, psychological, or social nature. One thinks here of the bloodless takeover of Mecca by the Prophet (s.a.w.) or of the plague in Damascus at the time of Umar (r.a.), where the Muslims moved into the mountains, that is, into a clean environment, and the plague thereby disappeared.

How is it, then, that Muslims so often adopt the narratives of the unbelievers, which are not in harmony with facts or Islamic teaching, and that, instead of questioning these narratives, they bend their religion to fit them?

The answer is clear: the narrative of governments, media, and research and educational institutions is spun by Dajjal. And whoever controls the narrative controls the people! It is so overwhelming that it drives Muslims onto the defensive, until they adopt the narrative. Thereby they become toxic, just like microorganisms, and cause spiritual diseases in the body of the Islamic community.

This hadith describes it excellently. In the beginning, people lived in ignorance, that is, they followed the false narrative, with all the well-known negative consequences. Then, with Islam, came the right narrative. In time, the right narrative becomes falsified, until there are people who send others to Hell with a false narrative, and until there is no longer any Imam of the Muslims (that is, since 1924), but only various sects. This is the time to distance oneself from the toxic environment (that is, the globalized society) and to seek solitude, until finally, with al-Mahdi, a new leader appears, and with him the right narrative again.

___________________________

Related articles: